Reflect, ruminate, feel, re-read. Repeat.
Serious synopsis of This Mobius Strip of Ifs by Mathias Freese: In this impressive and varied collection of
creative essays, Mathias B. Freese jousts with American culture. A
mixture of the author's reminiscences, insights, observations, and
criticism, the book examines the use and misuse of psychotherapy,
childhood trauma, complicated family relationships, his frustration as a
teacher, and the enduring value of tenaciously writing through it all.
Freese scathingly describes the conditioning society imposes upon
artists and awakened souls. Whether writing about the spiritual teacher,
Krishnamurti, poet and novelist, Nikos Kazantzakis, or film giants such
as Orson Welles and Buster Keaton, the author skewers where he can and
applauds those who refuse to compromise and conform. A psychotherapist
for twenty-five years, Freese conveys a unique combination of
psychodynamic thinking and Eastern philosophy while examining
Existentialism, alternative education, and Jewish values.
At times I admit I felt a little embarrassed as I felt that the author was baring his soul, as many of the essays are so deeply personal -- from this thoughts on losing his wife, his reminisces of fatherhood, to his beliefs on how education conditions us, to religion, to his favourite movies ... and even to his skirmishes with book bloggers!
The essays are diverse as is Freese's style. He can be succinct, delivering his blows in a few quick strokes, or he can meander on a bit then make his point, if at all. The book has three main sections:
Whatever the essay, he is uncompromising on his thoughts and beliefs that have taken him a lifetime to ruminate upon and to verbalize through his writings. What strikes me most is that he obviously does not write to please the reader, he writes to please himself. He could definitely piss people off. (and warning: don't expect politically correct language - he calls it what it is!) But then, that is what is so good about this book!
You become Freese's reader, student, confidant. He obviously doesn't need you to agree, but he does want to provoke you.
As I was reading this, I started remembering conversations with my grandfather where he would say what he wanted to about a life lived. A simple man of few words, the truths that he revealed in those talks still remain with me. Yes, expect some warm fuzzies.
And as quickly as I started to warm up to Freese, he turned devil's advocate and transformed into one of my former professors -- someone who challenged me to challenge my beliefs -- making me uncomfortable at the least, even angry, or sheepish as the case may be. On some occasions I agree, on others, it not an agreement without a fight. Other times, it's just a total rejection.
You'll feel like you've picked Freese's mind after having finished this! He'll get some reaction from you, I can assure you!
The essays that most resonated with me dealt mainly with Freese's family life.
My two cents
I have been reading this slim book of essays on and off for two months. I couldn't rush through it. It is one of those books that you read a few pages a time, ruminate upon, reread, and then potentially regroup. If you're looking for a diversion or some escape, this isn't it. If you're looking for a something with some real meat, and want to be challenged, provoked ... and you want to feel, then consider picking this up.This Mobius Strip of Ifs by Mathias B. Freese |
The essays are diverse as is Freese's style. He can be succinct, delivering his blows in a few quick strokes, or he can meander on a bit then make his point, if at all. The book has three main sections:
- "Knowledge is death" comprised of 19 essays drawing from his years as a therapist, an educator and a writer, and his thoughts on religion, on being Jewish and the Holocaust;
- Metaphorical Noodles comprised of 7 essays, dealing mainly with movies and books; and
- The Seawall comprised of 10 essays mainly about family life.
You become Freese's reader, student, confidant. He obviously doesn't need you to agree, but he does want to provoke you.
As I was reading this, I started remembering conversations with my grandfather where he would say what he wanted to about a life lived. A simple man of few words, the truths that he revealed in those talks still remain with me. Yes, expect some warm fuzzies.
And as quickly as I started to warm up to Freese, he turned devil's advocate and transformed into one of my former professors -- someone who challenged me to challenge my beliefs -- making me uncomfortable at the least, even angry, or sheepish as the case may be. On some occasions I agree, on others, it not an agreement without a fight. Other times, it's just a total rejection.
You'll feel like you've picked Freese's mind after having finished this! He'll get some reaction from you, I can assure you!
**
"I don't feel, or I don't believe, that my core self is any different than it was at forty. Inside I am still me, narrow here, expansive there, emotionally stingy for that, largesse for that. I am still impatient with others, aging has not moderated that. I ask myself here, what is it I want from aging? Does it provide solace or sorrow, or should I experience some kind of generativity which Erik Erikson spoke of, the capacity for giving one's wisdom, the whole ball of wax and human lint we accrete from a lifetime's living?" - p. 8
"The essay On Reading Christopher Hitchens's God is Not Great" struck a chord in me. Freese subtitles this "How Religion Poisons Everything" and looks into some very touchy territory (you have been warned):
"Hitchens repeatedly makes the telling comment --and obvious one, at that -- that all religions are man-made. Once you creep into that, see its merit, you then can see that religion is the cause of crusades, jihads, circumcision, resurrection, the three Magi, the Virgin Mary, Mohammad fling away on his horse, the Conquistadores, ghettoes, and forevermore. I once had a conversation with a close friend who I connected to because he was open and fairly liberal. We spoke about religion. I felt free to do that with him. I asked if he believed in ghouls. No response required. he chuckled. I went on, How about vampires? Witches? Flying carpets? Dragons? Ghosts? Finally, he asked me to get to the point. I did. And yet I told him, you believe in a preacher about 2,000 years ago who is a conflation of myths and never existed, actually rose and was resurrected [..]"
"Hitchens repeatedly makes the telling comment --and obvious one, at that -- that all religions are man-made. Once you creep into that, see its merit, you then can see that religion is the cause of crusades, jihads, circumcision, resurrection, the three Magi, the Virgin Mary, Mohammad fling away on his horse, the Conquistadores, ghettoes, and forevermore. I once had a conversation with a close friend who I connected to because he was open and fairly liberal. We spoke about religion. I felt free to do that with him. I asked if he believed in ghouls. No response required. he chuckled. I went on, How about vampires? Witches? Flying carpets? Dragons? Ghosts? Finally, he asked me to get to the point. I did. And yet I told him, you believe in a preacher about 2,000 years ago who is a conflation of myths and never existed, actually rose and was resurrected [..]"
And lastly, if you're a book blogger (read: me), "At Personal Posturings: Yahoos as Bloggers" may be of interest as Freese as an author tells it like it is. It made me laugh out loud. But it also made me realize that book bloggers and authors do a very strange little dance and regardless, are simply human. You'll get nice bloggers and some not-so-nice bloggers ... and vice versa.
These thoughts spring from a mere first reading. I am sure that I will be rereading the essays once again and will find some more nuggets in there -- because this is one of those books which you can read and re-read and come out with even more great finds.
I received a copy of this book in exchange for an honest review.
These thoughts spring from a mere first reading. I am sure that I will be rereading the essays once again and will find some more nuggets in there -- because this is one of those books which you can read and re-read and come out with even more great finds.
Verdict: A challenging, provoking, and entertaining read that will get you thinking and examining your beliefs. An immensely satisfying read if you decide to stop and ruminate. What comes to mind is the old adage: An unexamined life is not worth living. I envy Mathias Freese as he is obviously living and living well.
First line: I was casually informed a year after the fact by the editor of
Grafitti that my short story "Herbie" published in that magazine was
listed in Martha Foley's The Best American Short Stories of 1975 under "Distinctive Short Stories of 1974."
Last line: I advocate you rummage for yourself after forty years.
- Read more at Mathias B. Freese's blog
- Read my review of Mathias B. Freese's Down to a Sunless Sea
- Check out my Friday 56 and Book Beginnings post
I received a copy of this book in exchange for an honest review.
Dear Aloi: what a telling, incisive and feeling response to my book. Above all, it is fair and balanced.You reviewed the book and not me. It is also free of ageism which is pretty rife among some bloggers who think Bambi is a porn flic. It is such an able and splendid response that I'm putting it up on my site so that both you and I can crow!
ReplyDeletekind regards,
Matt